Legal Opinion
People v. Ader
Mount Vernon City Court
Decided May 4, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sam Eisenberg, J.
The defendant Albert .Ader is charged under Dockets Nos. 562-82 and 692-82 with four violations of subdivision 4A of section 194 of the City Ordinance of the City of Mount Vernon. A fifth offense is charged under Docket No. 692-82 for violation of subdivision 38 of section 227 of the City Ordinance of the City of Mount Vernon.
Subdivision 38 of section 227 of the city ordinance would prohibit the selling of products, such as flowers, on a public street without a written permit. The motion made herein does not ask for dismissal of that charge and thus that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- People v. WhitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- People v. GeorgeNew York County Court, Westchester County · 1939
- Byrne v. Long Island State Park CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commissioner of Transportation v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1987