Legal Opinion

Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare & Pension Funds v. Moser

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 19, 1994No. 93 C 377PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LINDBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff, the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds (“Welfare and Pension Funds” or “Funds”), has filed a declaratory judgment action against defendant Paul Moser, d/b/a Paul Moser Trucking (“Moser”), seeking a determination of the rights and other legal relations of the parties arising under sections 502 and 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 USC §§ 1132, 1145, and under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 USC § 185. The Welfare and Pension Funds are ERISA…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Waste Management of Michigan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Wisconsin UFCW Unions & Employers Health Plan v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API