Legal Opinion

Hume v. Inglis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. 27925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrieeith, J.

The bill of complaint in this case is drawn in three aspects: A bill to reform certain deeds of conveyance, to cancel clouds on title, and to confirm title. There was a final decree in which the bill was sustained in all its said three aspects. However, it is distinctly alleged in the bill, and is shown in the proof, that the land in question, is in the actual occupancy of one of the defendants, and that this defendant is asserting some claim of right adverse to the complainant.

A bill to confirm title can be maintained as such only when there is no adverse occupancy of the land. Section 549',…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCray v. McCrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Planters' Package Co. v. ParsonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mays Food Products, Inc. v. Gloster Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rice v. McMullenMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Moore v. KuljisMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Seward v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hawkins Hardware Co. v. CrewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Robinson v. ColottaMississippi Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API