Legal Opinion

Northrup v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal .by the.defendant, George S. Porter, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs for $902.27 damages and costs, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Oneida on the 23d day of October, 1896, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 30th day of October, 1896, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Follett, J.:

This action was begun August 10,1896, to recover on a Columbia Fire Lloyds policy of insurance which was executed by twenty-live underwriters, through Porter & Armstrong, their attorneys, by which they insured the plaintiffs under the firm name of jSTorthrup & Latcher on each of five brick buildings situate on the eásterly side of Genesee street in the city of Utica, which are described in the policy as follows: .

“ $4,000. On the brick building situated on the easterly side of Gene-see street and 100 feet northerly from Clinton Place located on lot FTo. 371 Genesee street, Utica,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ming v. . CorbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. . Amazon Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Ming v. CorbinNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Jones v. De CourseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Leach v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northrup v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Crane v. BarronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API