Legal Opinion

Harding v. Goord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 22, 2005No. 04-1907-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-appellant Keith Harding appeals from the October 3, 2003, judgment of the district court dismissing Harding’s complaint filed, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendant-appellees, various medical staff and prison officials at two state prisons. Harding’s complaint was dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) after he repeatedly failed to comply with discovery demands and court orders.

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., Appeal of Greenspan, Jaffe & Rosenblatt, Leon J. Greenspan, Paul D. Jaffe and Victor E. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Anthony Romandette v. Weetabix Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Spencer v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Finley v. Parvin/Dohrmann Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bailey v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  2. Bey v. NugentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  3. Cuffee Jr. v. GonzalezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Cui v. East Palace One, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Figueroa v. SierraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API