Legal Opinion

Richards v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF THE PORT

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 2011No. 2010-CA-1171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.

Lin this appeal, plaintiffs 1 assert that the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ exceptions of collateral estoppel and issue preclusion. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

1 This lawsuit arises out of the M/V BRIGHT FIELD allision with the River-walk Mall along the Mississippi riverfront in New Orleans on December 14, 1996. Plaintiffs sued non-vessel interests, which included the International Rivercenter, New Orleans Rivercenter, NORC Riparian Properties, Corp. (“IRC/NORC”) and the Board of Commissioners of the Port of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical ClinicWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Green v. Ancora-Citronelle Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Boyd v. Allied Signal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Desoto Regional Health SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Webb v. MorellaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Tramond Bourgeois v. Select Oilfield Services, LLC and Fab-Con, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API