Legal Opinion

Buildings Development Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The cases were submitted on the evidence presented to the board of review. The rights claimed by the *359appellants rest wholly on the proposition that the evidence before the board establishes that the assessments involved were excessive. The determinations of the board are prima facie correct. Sec. 70.47 (7), Stats. This is also true of the assessor’s valuation. “If there is credible evidence before the board that may in any reasonable view support the assessor’s valuation, that valuation must be upheld by the board.” State ex rel. North Shore Development Co. v. Axtell, 216 Wis. 153, 157, 256…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WeiherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Flambeau Paper Co. v. WindusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State ex rel. North Shore Development Co. v. AxtellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Wahl v. H. W. & S. M. Tullgren, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. International Business Machines Corp. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Ex Rel. New Lisbon State Bank v. City of New LisbonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API