Legal Opinion

Hovarth v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 23, 2003No. 2002-299-AppealPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Did the Family Court have jurisdiction in the circumstances of this case to adjudicate a post-divorce request by one parent seeking to require the other parent to account for certain money deposited into accounts they established for the benefit of their daughter under the former Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) and the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA)? 1 Answering this question in the negative, we affirm a Family Court order denying the motion of the plaintiff, Mary-Margaret Hovarth (mother), seeking to require the defendant, Walter R. Craddock (father), to provide an…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rubano v. DiCenzoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. Waldeck v. PinerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Adam v. AdamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  4. Lubecki v. AshcroftSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Barone v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Debora D'Alessandro v. Douglas CanigliaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API