Legal Opinion

Berkebile v. Nationwide Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County

Decided November 17, 1977No. 175 of 1977Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHAULIS, J.,

This case represents the first time this court has been called upon to interpret provisions of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, 40 P.S. §1009.101 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as No-fault Act and cited by Purdon’s section numbers). The matter is now before the court on defendants’ prehminary objections to plaintiffs’ complaint.

*2441. BACKGROUND

The No-fault Act was intended to eliminate the necessity of the victim of a motor vehicle accident having to demonstrate the fault of another party in order to be compensated for injuries…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Escambia Treating Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1976
  3. Rescigno v. PicinichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. O'Shanick v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Hamilton v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API