State v. Bolin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.
In this criminal matter, Berry Scott Bolin (Bolin) asserts the trial court erred in (1) denying a requested jury charge on certain provisions of the “Castle Doctrine” contained in Section 16 — 11—440 of the South Carolina Code, and (2) denying his motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On the night of February 18, 2006, Bolin and several other individuals were guests in the home of Bradley Deal (Deal). Travis Falls (Falls), Holly McCarter (McCarter), Bobby Hovis (Hovis), and two others decided to drive to Deal’s home to attack Deal, his brother, and various other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Brightman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. IsaacSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013