Legal Opinion

Scheer v. Cromwell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1965No. 20997PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle.

The parties to this action appear in the same order as in the trial court, and we will refer to them in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant or by name.

Scheer brought an action against Cromwell, alleging that Cromwell’s negligence was the proximate cause of an accident in which he suffered a “whip lash” type of injury to his neck. He prayed for damages in the amount of $12,500. Cromwell denied plaintiff’s allegations. She also pled two affirmative defenses. A trial was had to a jury which returned a verdict for Scheer in the amount of $95.

A motion for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Gilligan v. BlakesleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. McDonald v. Jarka Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blueflame Gas, Inc. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Bear Valley Church of Christ v. DeBoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Ninth District Production Credit Ass'n v. Ed Duggan, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Polster v. Griff's of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Ross v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API