Legal Opinion

Boutte v. Mills

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1998No. 98-255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

liAMY, Judge.

This is a workers’ compensation case in which the claimant, Antoinette Boutte, seeks a judgment for additional compensation ben-efite, attorney’s fees and penalties. The workers’ compensation judge, having determined that claimant’s employer, Port Barre Mills, had correctly calculated the amount of compensation benefits to be paid to her, dismissed all claims with prejudice. Claimant appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part and render.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts of this case are not in dispute. Boutte was a seamstress at Port Barre Mills. At the time of her injury,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Allor v. Belden Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Johnson v. FID. & CAS. INS. CO. OF NYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Clifton v. Ditto's ApparelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Batiste v. Crowley Mills/FarleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API