Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Jones, United States of America v. Charles Anthony Rosenberg

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1989No. 88-5264, 88-5278PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Based on evidence obtained through an undercover operation and other surveillance, a grand jury indicted Ronald Jones and Charles Anthony Rosenberg on charges relating to three sales of cocaine. The government’s theory of the case was that Rosenberg participated directly in the sales to an undercover agent and Jones was Rosenberg’s drug supplier. After a joint criminal trial, a jury convicted Jones and Rosenberg of multiple offenses related to distributing cocaine. Both defendants appeal, and we affirm.

Initially, Jones argues the district court committed error in refusing to grant his motions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. LuethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Manuel OteroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Theodore C. Miller, United States of America v. Rodney Allen Van BeekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. ThirionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Diego RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Miguel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Joseph William GillockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Jackie L. Luster, United States of America v. Sue LusterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API