Legal Opinion

Potter v. Fritz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On certiorari. Argued at February Term, 1892, before Justices Dixon, Reed and Garrison.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

In an ordinary action upon a book account for more than $200, the District Court of the city of Trenton decided that a certain replication to a plea of set-off was demurrable, and ordered that the plaintiffs make a further reply to such plea within ten days. On a rule being entered to this effect, the plaintiffs sued out the present certiorari to review the decision in this court.

The jurisdiction of the District Court is unquestioned.

In such cases the writ of certiorari is in the nature of a writ of error, and cannot be brought until after…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. Woolley v. BellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API