Legal Opinion

Beisman v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court found that when the deceased purported to make a choice of retirement benefits during February, 1944, he was lacking in sufficient mental capacity to understand properly the nature, quality and effect of his decision. This finding, if we assume that it is sufficient to sustain the judgment, is not supported by the evidence. The proof was insufficient as matter of law to establish that decedent, when he made application for retirement, did not understand, not only that he was retiring, but also that he had elected to receive the maximum allowance payable during his life, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Moritz v. MoritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Moritz v. . MoritzNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API