Legal Opinion

Little Rock Cooperage Co. v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action on judgment. Before Judge Smith. Pulaski superior court. August term, 1899. The Little Rock Cooperage Company sued Hodge upon a foreign judgment. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s petition, and the demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff sued out a writ of error, and upon review here the judgment sustaining the demurrer was reversed.

Read the full summary

Action on judgment. Before Judge Smith. Pulaski superior court. August term, 1899. The Little Rock Cooperage Company sued Hodge upon a foreign judgment. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s petition, and the demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff sued out a writ of error, and upon review here the judgment sustaining the demurrer was reversed. Little Rock Cooperage Co. v. Hodge, 105 Ga. 828. When the case came on for trial again in the lower court, “counsel for defendant stated in his place that only the general demurrer went to the Supreme Court, and that the special demurrer did not go up…

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

The above headnotes and the full official report of the facts of the ease, which follows them, are amply sufficient to show the precise rulings of the court and the reasons upon which they are based.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. AultmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Barco v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Sullivan v. Douglas Gibbons Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Drischel v. DrischelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API