Legal Opinion

Randolph v. . Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoKe, J.

The location of plaintiff’s beginning corner at the “black circle at 6,” as described in the surveyor’s plat and found by the jury, is directly and naturally affected by the proper placing of a corner some distance south on the same line at a “white-oak” corner. With the view of showing that the true location of this white-oak corner was at the point claimed by the plaintiff, a witness for plaintiff, Malone Randolph, was permitted, over defendant’s objection, to testify that one Green Woody, disinterested, and dead at the time of trial, had pointed out the white-oak stump as claimed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. Hemphill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Lamb v. . CopelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Hoge v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Bland v. Beasley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Owens v. Blackwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API