Legal Opinion

Hardin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1941No. 8 Div. 108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In the opinion certified to the Court of Appeals, 3 So.2d 83, in response to the inquiry it was observed:

“The italicized provision [of Section 51 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, Gen. Acts 1936-37, Sp.Sess., p. 83,- Code 1940, Tit. 29, § 68] evinces a legislative intent by reference to adopt the provisions of Section 4704 of the Code 1923, prescribing the penalty for unlawful transportation of liquors into the State, and under the doctrine of ‘reference and adoption’ the provisions of that section of the Code prescribing the penalty, will be read into the statute.1’

Upon more .mature…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurst v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Hardin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lovett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Shirley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API