Legal Opinion

Dunscomb v. Randolph

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. F. K. Heisecelt,, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMoAi-isteR, J.

The questions presented for our determination upon this record are, first, the right of the defendant, Randolph, to maintain windows and openings in a certain division wall between his premises and those of the complainant; second, the liability of complainant for the wall which stands near the shed erected by the complainant on the rear of his lot. The facts necessary to be stated for a clear understanding of the issues between the parties are that complainant and defendant are owners of adjoining lots on the east side of Plain street in the city of Memphis. On the 18th of October, 1890,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hawkes v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Carroll Blake Const. Co. v. BoyleTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. First Nat. Bldg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Christensen v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Daugherty v. ToomeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API