Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sakel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decree, entered January 10, 1964, unanimously modified on the law, to grant respondent-appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the petition herein to the extent that the petition seeks compensation for services of petitioner previously compensated for in the payment made to John Harlan Amen as attorney appearing of record for the proponent and temporary administratrix; and decree otherwise affirmed, without costs. The petitioner, an attorney, who was engaged by Amen as counsel to perform certain work in the estate, furnished Amen his affidavit, verified December 4, 1959,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reitz v. KrystofowiczNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API