WM. A. Rogers, Ltd. v. Rogers Silverware Redemption Bureau, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Bill by William A. Rogers, Limited,- against the Rogers Silverware Redemption Bureau, Incorporated, which sought affirmative relief.
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, District Judge.
The complainant is a manufacturer of silver-plated ware. The defendant is engaged in a trading stamp business. On January 26 and May 5, 1916, plaintiff and defendant contracted, among other things, that the defendant might use the name “Rogers” in its corporate name in accordance with the terms of said agreement, and the defendant contracted to purchase the silver-plated ware of the plaintiff, and no other, in redeeming the trading stamps *179which it contracted to redeem for its various customers throughout the country. The defendant further agreed to carefully avoid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rogers v. Wm. Rogers Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- Wm. Rogers Mfg. Co. v. RogersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1898
- Wm. Rogers Mfg. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Wm. A. Rogers, Ltd. v. H. O. Rogers Silver Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
- Wm. A. Rogers, Ltd. v. Cohannet Silver Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Trading Co. v. H. E. Heacock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- International Silver Co. v. Oneida Community, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Coca-Cola Co v. Happiness Candy Stores, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- International Silver Co. v. Oneida Community, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934