Legal Opinion

Appling v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 3, 1995No. 13-93-334-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of felony theft and assessed punishment of ninety-nine years confinement in prison after appellant pleaded “true” to two enhancement paragraphs. Appellant appeals his conviction and raises four points of error, alleging the trial court erred: (i) by allowing appellant’s unrecorded, oral statements in evidence; (ii) by refusing to suppress the liquor confiscated from appellant’s vehicle; and (iii) by failing to conduct an in camera hearing to determine whether the identity of a confidential informer should be disclosed. Because we find…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. United States v. Reginald James CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  2. Oveal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Bee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Hypolite v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API