Appling v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of felony theft and assessed punishment of ninety-nine years confinement in prison after appellant pleaded “true” to two enhancement paragraphs. Appellant appeals his conviction and raises four points of error, alleging the trial court erred: (i) by allowing appellant’s unrecorded, oral statements in evidence; (ii) by refusing to suppress the liquor confiscated from appellant’s vehicle; and (iii) by failing to conduct an in camera hearing to determine whether the identity of a confidential informer should be disclosed. Because we find…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- United States v. Reginald James CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Oveal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Bee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Hypolite v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.