Huff v. Gilbert
Indiana Supreme Court
In error.
1Opinion of the Court
REPLEVIN. Pleas, 1. That the defendant had not taken or detained the property. 2. Property in a stranger. 3. Property in the defendant. The plaintiff joined issue on the first plea, and replied to the second and third, property in himself. Verdict, “We find the property to be in the plaintiff.” Judgment against the defendant for costs. Held, that this verdict did not authorise a judgment for the plaintiff, as the jury had not found that the horse had been taken or detained by the defendant.
*20A bill of exceptions relative to the affidavit and bond in this case, stated—“ which affidavit and bond…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Mays v. DeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Atchison & Nebraska Railroad v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Roberts v. BartlettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- Mills v. SimmondsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Doe ex dem. Calvert v. MakepeaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.