Legal Opinion
Ducote v. Union Pacific Railroad
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 2009No. 08-1208, 08-1001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
| ¶Plaintiffs-appellants, Quinn L. Ducote and Judy Ducote, assert that the trial court erred by granting a partial summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Union Pacific Railway Company (UP), and by denying the Ducotes’ and Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development’s (DOTD) motions to strike certain documents from the record. Defendant DOTD filed a separate writ application, claiming that the trial court erred in denying its motion to strike and in not granting its motion for summary judgment. These matters were consolidated. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ShanklinSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Louviere v. ByersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Phillips v. Lafayette Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Moreno Properties Two, L.L.C. v. Acadiana Investment Group, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ducote v. Union Pacific RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Jordan v. Rapides Regional Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.