Legal Opinion

Farley v. Howard

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a covenant against incumbrances contained in a deed made by defendant to plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of a covenant against incumbrances contained in a deed made by the defendant to the plaintiff on March 31, 1892, of a certain lot in Hew York city known by the street number 34 West Seventy-second street, on the ground that at the time of such conveyance such property was subject to a certain easement or servitude alleged to have been theretofore acquired by one Boskowitz, the owner of the premises No. 32 West Seventy-second street, adjoining the premises No. 34 on the east thereof. On the 11th of Hovember, 1886, this defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Tefft v. . MunsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. House v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Wilson v. WightmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Wilklow v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Obrock v. Crolly Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API