Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Panek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1964No. 16306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Ben Panek, appellee, filed suit against appellant Mildred M. Douglass on an instrument purportedly secured by vendor’s lien and deed of trust on real estate, which instrument he alleges comes within the definition of a negotiable promissory note as provided in Art. 5947, Sec. 184, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.

Summary judgment was rendered in favor of appellee for $6,763.00 principal plus interest and attorneys’ fees, amounting to a total of $9,053.15. No foreclosure was awarded.

Appellant’s first point is that the instrument sued on is not a negotiable promissory note as defined in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freeberg v. Securities Investment Co. of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Lane Co. v. CrumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Kelsay Lumber Co. v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Wood v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API