Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steen v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2010No. 1024 C.D. 2009Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge McCullough.

Because I believe that Terry L. Steen and Anita I. Steen (the Steens), as owners of an easement across property condemned by the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (Commission), are entitled to just compensation for the taking, I respectfully dissent.1

Article 1, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides that private property shall not “be taken or applied to public use, without authority of law and without just compensation being first made or secured.” Both our Pennsylvania Supreme Court and this Court have held that an easement is extinguished…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Captline v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. BeamerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API