Legal Opinion
Gene Cashman and Athena Sutsos v. City of Cotati, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 2004No. 03-15066PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Gene Cashman and Athena Sutsos, both mobilehome park owners, allege that the rent control ordinance adopted by appellee City of Cotati, California (“the City”) effects a regulatory taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. After granting their motion for summary judgment and entering judgment, the district court amended then vacated that judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b), respectively. The district court conducted a trial and entered judgment for the City. Cashman and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manufactured Home Communities Inc. v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Manufactured Home Communities Inc. v. City Of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Guggenheim v. City of GoletaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Minidoka Irrigation District v. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Fredericks v. Village of KykotsmoviHopi Appellate Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.