Ex parte Woods
Supreme Court of Arkansas
This matter came up on motion. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
It appears that Woods obtained a judgment before a justice of the peace against Headington, and issued process of garnishment against1 John and James McQuaid; both of whom were represented to be indebted to Headington. The process was never served upon John McQuaid, nor any notice given him of the proceedings instituted : judgment however was rendered against both, as by default.
The Statute declares that the writ, if issued by a justice, shall be directed to the proper constable, and shall be served and returned in the same manner as writs of summons; viz: by reading the same to the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hunt's Heirs v. Ellison's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Ex parte AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. Texas Produce Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Ex parte PileSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1849
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.