Legal Opinion
United States v. Rueb
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 20, 2009No. 4:09CR3006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAVID L. PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendant has been charged with receiving and possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1)(B). Filing No. 1. Pending before me is defendant’s “Objection to Proposed Release Conditions,” (filing no. 6), interpreted as a motion to remove conditions of release imposed on February 9, 2009. The court imposed electronic monitoring and a curfew in accordance with the Adam Walsh Amendments of the Bail Reform Act, (18 U.S.C. § 8112(c)(1)(B)). See, filing no. IS, ¶7®. The defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Storie Lynn OrtaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. ArzbergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- United States v. TorresDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. PolouizziDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. SmedleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
- United States v. PoolDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- United States v. CosseyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- United States v. BlaserDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.