Legal Opinion

Gordon T. O'Brien and Derelyse O'Brien v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1985No. 83-1253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this case is whether both a new jobs credit and an investment credit may be claimed in full for the same expenditure.

In 1977 appellants constructed a fence. They claimed a new jobs credit under section 44B * on $3,050, the amount paid in wages for labor relating to the construction of the new fence. Appellants also claimed an investment tax credit under section 38 on that same $3,050. In the tax court, appellee argued that the allowance of both a new jobs credit and an investment credit for the full cost of the fence would provide petitioners with a double…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United Telecommunications, Inc. (Formerly United Utilities, Incorporated) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. United Telecommunications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  5. United Telecommunications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rome I, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  2. Thrifty Oil Co. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Willamette Indus. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Willamette Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  5. Jacobs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API