Gordon T. O'Brien and Derelyse O'Brien v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is whether both a new jobs credit and an investment credit may be claimed in full for the same expenditure.
In 1977 appellants constructed a fence. They claimed a new jobs credit under section 44B * on $3,050, the amount paid in wages for labor relating to the construction of the new fence. Appellants also claimed an investment tax credit under section 38 on that same $3,050. In the tax court, appellee argued that the allowance of both a new jobs credit and an investment credit for the full cost of the fence would provide petitioners with a double…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United Telecommunications, Inc. (Formerly United Utilities, Incorporated) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United Telecommunications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- United Telecommunications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rome I, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
- Thrifty Oil Co. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Willamette Indus. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Willamette Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
- Jacobs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.