Legal Opinion

Teasdel v. Teasdel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1984No. CA-1689PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] On June 2, 1983 the district court rendered judgment dismissing the plaintiff's rule for an increase in alimony and for contempt. The court made absolute the defendant's rule to eliminate alimony and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff five hundred dollars ($500) per month alimony for a period of one year. The plaintiff appeals this judgment and we affirm.

[2] The sole issue presented for review is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in terminating the plaintiff's alimony.

[3] The plaintiff contends that her needs cannot be met by the trial court's award. She further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Lovell v. LovellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Green v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Flamm v. FlammLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ourso v. OursoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Teasdel v. TeasdelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. Gibson v. GibsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Gravois v. GravoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Church v. TeasdelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API