Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Wittenberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 24, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

As the debtor willfully and intentionally swore falsely concerning material matters in the supplementary proceeding, the subsequent “ correction ” of the false testimony may not defeat the remedy for false swearing provided for in section 788 of the Civil Practice Act.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and the debtor is fined for contempt of court in the sum of $250, payable as follows: Fifty dollars on the first day of March next, and the f balance in equal monthly installments of twenty-five dollars on the first day of each…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gel-Lap Associates, Inc. v. New York Boarding & Sales Stables, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API