Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pharoah v. Lapes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1990No. 613 and 614Published

1Dissent

CIRILLO, President Judge,

dissenting:

Because I feel that under the circumstances of this case George A. Lapes (“father”) should not be forced to finance his son Anthony’s education at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”), I must respectfully dissent.

As the majority notes, Anthony was in the enviable position of having to decide between attending MIT or Georgia Institute of Technology (“Georgia Tech”). Confronted with this decision, Anthony consulted a number of people, including his father. During this brief consultation, Anthony informed his father that he was considering…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Larsen v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API