Legal Opinion

Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 1975No. S-115Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

As this court stated in Tuz v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., Fla.App. (1st), 290 So.2d 547:

“Estoppel by judgment precludes the parties from litigating in a second suit issues which were actually adjudicated in a previous suit, even though the causes of action were different.”

But for Hoffman v. Jones, Fla., 280 So.2d 431, the above would be the situation in the-case sub judice. Now, however, comparative negligence is an issue in this case (see Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Arnett, Fla.App. (1st), 303 So.2d 653, opinion filed November 5, 1974, and Fitzsimmons v.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Fitzsimmons v. City of PensacolaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. ArnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Tuz v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API