Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
As this court stated in Tuz v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., Fla.App. (1st), 290 So.2d 547:
“Estoppel by judgment precludes the parties from litigating in a second suit issues which were actually adjudicated in a previous suit, even though the causes of action were different.”
But for Hoffman v. Jones, Fla., 280 So.2d 431, the above would be the situation in the-case sub judice. Now, however, comparative negligence is an issue in this case (see Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Arnett, Fla.App. (1st), 303 So.2d 653, opinion filed November 5, 1974, and Fitzsimmons v.…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Fitzsimmons v. City of PensacolaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. ArnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Tuz v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973