Legal Opinion

Hay v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 20, 1992No. Docket Nos. 27785-89, 27786-89UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM G. HAY AND KAREN L. HAY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; RICHARD F. HOLM AND DOROTHY L. HOLM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Hay v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 27785-89, 27786-891

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-409; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 433; 64 T.C.M. (CCH) 228;

July 20, 1992, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

For Petitioners: Gerald W. Gray and David S. Nommay.

For Respondent: Shelleyanne W.L. Chang.

RUWE

RUWE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

RUWE, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners'…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Stanley Works v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  3. McGovern v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Symington v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. Byram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palmer Ranch Holdings Ltd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Palmer Ranch Holdings LTD v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API