Neitz v. Hilker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hardin District Gowrt. — Hon. John L. Stevens, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
I.. The plaintiff was arrested upon an information from a justice of the peace, charging 1. Practice in supreme court: evidence: bill of exceptions. Mm with larceny, and, upon a preliminary examination before the justice, the prosecution was dismissed and the plaintiff discharged. It is not disputed that the arrest was procured by the defendant William Hilker. The participation of Ernest Hilker in commencing the prosecution was disputed. It appears from the abstract of the appellants that objections were taken to the rulings of the court in refusing to allow the defendants to introduce in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Fairbairn v. HaisletSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Neitz v. HilkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892