Legal Opinion

State v. Rook

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 24, 1974No. 1020-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

This is a filiation proceeding wherein trial was had to a jury. The jury concluded that the defendant, Forrest Rook, was not the father of the complaining witness’ child. The trial court denied the state’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial.

The state’s assignments of error raise three issues:(1) Was it prejudicial error to admit in evidence a letter to defense counsel from the Veterans Administration Hospital? We hold that admission of the letter was a violation of the hearsay evidence rule, and the effect of that violation was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. WhalonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. State v. SpadoniWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. GersvoldWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Staley v. StaleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. State v. ColbertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. State v. LowrieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. State v. MadryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API