Sackett v. Public Storage Management
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that the contract between the operator and renter of a public storage unit defines their legal relationship. Thus, when the renter’s storage unit lock was rendered inoperable by vandalism and the operator placed its own lock on the unit, the provisions of their contract controlled and no involuntary bailment was created.
This is an action for negligence for the loss of Scott Sackett’s personal property which was stolen while stored in a self-service storage unit operated by Public Storage Management (PSM). The trial court granted summary judgment to PSM on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Copelin v. Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Gordon H. Ball, Inc. v. ParreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cregg v. Ministor VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eifler v. Shurgard Capital Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Kanovsky v. At Your Door Self StorageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019