Legal Opinion

People v. Hoffman

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2010No. 08CA1008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RICHMAN.

Defendant, James T. Hoffman, appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant. Pursuant to a conditional plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a schedule II controlled substance while preserving the right to appeal the suppression ruling. We vacate the judgment entered on the plea, reverse the trial court's order, and remand the case for further proceedings.

I. Background

Based upon evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant, defendant was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. AltmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. KruegerColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Neuhaus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. v. RichardsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. People v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  5. Christopher Adrian Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API