Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. One 1981 Volvo Coupe Manufacturer's No. YV1AX4728B1199644

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1985No. Appeal, No. 3458 C.D. 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Joey Scotten, who owned a 1981 Volvo Coupe automobile, appeals from an order of the Court of Com*306mon. Pleas of Montgomery County directing the forfeiture of the vehicle under Section 28 of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act (Act), Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, as amended, 35 P.S. §780-128. Section 28 of the Act provides in part:(a) The following shall be subject to forfeiture to the Commonwealth and no property right shall exist in them:(4) All conveyances, including aircrafts, vehicles, or vessels, which are used or intended for use, to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. One 1965 Buick 4 Door Sedan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. One (1) 1971 Ford Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. One 1978 Porsche Coupe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API