Legal Opinion

Barr v. Pratt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 16, 1991No. 89C-7379; CA A63535Published

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in a forcible entry and detainer (FED) action, ORS 105.110, awarding possession to plaintiff. Defendants contend that the notice of default that plaintiff provided under the land sale contract and ORS 93.915 was inadequate and that, in any event, the escrow company’s acceptance of defendants’ payment cured their default. We affirm.

Plaintiff sold property to defendant Pratt. Defendants Guist continued to live on the property, as they had before the sale. The land sale contract required Pratt to make monthly payments of $1,000 at Key Title and Escrow (Key…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon State Bar v. Security Escrows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. McDonald v. Title Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. McCallums, Inc. v. Mountain Title Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API