Legal Opinion

Sellers v. Hanratty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1938No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This record is in very unsatisfactory shape for our reyiew. The proceeding is on a bill in equity for the dis solution of a partnership and for an accounting. The last order made by the chancellor is entitled “amended decree nisi.”

The court, in this decree, appointed a temporary receiver and directed that defendant account to plaintiffs. The propriety of this order is the only question now before us: Davidson v. Davidson, 262 Pa. 520, 106 A. 64; Rowley v. Rowley, 289 Pa. 171, 137 A. 226. It is argued by appellants that an account was rendered at the hearing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Rowley v. RowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Provident Trust Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Sellers v. HanrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Wisocki v. Howell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1965
  5. Ziegler's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API