Sellers v. Hanratty
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This record is in very unsatisfactory shape for our reyiew. The proceeding is on a bill in equity for the dis solution of a partnership and for an accounting. The last order made by the chancellor is entitled “amended decree nisi.”
The court, in this decree, appointed a temporary receiver and directed that defendant account to plaintiffs. The propriety of this order is the only question now before us: Davidson v. Davidson, 262 Pa. 520, 106 A. 64; Rowley v. Rowley, 289 Pa. 171, 137 A. 226. It is argued by appellants that an account was rendered at the hearing and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davidson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Rowley v. RowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Provident Trust Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Sellers v. HanrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Wisocki v. Howell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1965
- Ziegler's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940