Legal Opinion

United States v. Castillo-Pena

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2012No. 10-5080PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge AGEE joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

We must address in this case what may constitute a claim of citizenship under 18 U.S.C. § 911. A jury convicted appellant Humberto Jose Castillo-Pena of falsely representing himself to be a United States citizen in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911 and of committing identity theft in relation to a false claim of U.S. citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. The district court denied Castillo-Pena’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and we affirm the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Tony Jerome MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Michael Robert PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. David RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. HagerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Bijan RafiekianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Eduardo Castellanos-LoyaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API