Legal Opinion

Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Lindley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1918No. Civil No. 1592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Gila. G. W. Shute, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohn Wilson Ross, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by appellee as the result of the negligen.ee of appellant. Appellee was working as motor helper on one of appellant’s underground ore trains, engaged in hauling ore on the 400-foot level of its mine from the Colorado shaft to the tipple, whence it was elevated to the surface. The train on which appellee was working consisted of ten steel cars of the capacity of five tons each, drawn by a 12-ton compressed air locomotive. Extending across the front end of the locomotive was a bumper, the top of which was of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Flynn Ex Rel. Eicke v. LindenfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Kauffroath v. WilburArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Pickwick Stages Corp. v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API