Legal Opinion

MIDLAND-ROSS CORPORATION v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 7, 1972No. Civ. A. C 68-462PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM K. THOMAS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Midland-Ross Corporation, as transferee and successor of Surface Combustion Corporation, sues for a refund of federal income taxes paid as a result of the disallowance of a deduction by the District Director of certain business expenses paid in connection with the sale, upon liquidation, of Surface’s assets to Midland, and a further disallowance of a depreciation deduction taken by Surface. As to a gain of Surface in the sale of its assets to Midland, the Government claims income tax is due while Midland asserts non-recognition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Cumberland Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Jud Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. D. B. AndersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Midland-Ross Corporation, Transferee of Surface Combustion Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API