Legal Opinion
Downs v. Karsh
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 3, 1943No. 92PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant is the owner of premises 106 C Street, Southeast, in which she formerly conducted a rooming house. There are about fifteen rooms in the house. In 1938, she leased it to Mr. and Mrs. Karsh. Their lease expired in 1941 and they have continued in possession as tenants by sufferance.
Appellant now lives with her daughter and son-in-law but he expects to be transferred from Washington and has offered his home for sale.. Until recently appellant’s son has helped support her but because he is now in the army is unable to continue such support. Appellant brought an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gould v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Shaffer v. BowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Staves v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Heindrich v. Dimas-ArutiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- De Bobula v. CoppedgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Olessoff v. OsbournDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Dant v. ForsytheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.