Legal Opinion

Davis v. Treasurer & Receiver General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

By her last will Mary E. Elliott gave to the town of Hopkinton in the State of New Hampshire the residue of her property as a perpetual fund to be invested by a board of three trustees (thereinafter named), the income to be expended under their direction and at their discretion “in conjunction with the almoners of the town, in aid of the worthy poor of American parentage, residents of the town of Hopkinton.” The testatrix died on November 23, 1908, leaving personal property within this Commonwealth which passed under this residuary clause, and the question to be decided is whether it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minot v. WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Matter of Estate of PrimeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Opinion of the Justices To the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Hooper v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Balch v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Assessors of Boston v. Garland School of Home MakingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Yale University v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rich v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Griggs v. ThulemeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API