Legal Opinion

Skidmore v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1967No. 14591PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Chief Justice.

A venue action. The question presented is whether the nonresident appellants, W. O. Skidmore and H. H. Harborth, d/b/a Skidmore and Harborth, had submitted to the venue of the District Court of Jim Wells County on the cross-action filed in said court by appellee, Keith E. Cook. The trial court determined that appellants had waived their right to be sued in their domicile by filing their original petition against appellee in Jim Wells County, and overruled appellants’ plea of privilege.

The parties agree that the rule to be applied in determining venue of a cross-action is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Hall, C.J.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Zachry v. Robertson Dba.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Connell v. SpiresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. City of Houston v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Powell v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'QUINN v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. Upjohn Co. v. Petro Chemicals Suppliers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Jernigan v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Schero v. MangesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Texoma National Bank of Sherman v. First State Bank of McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API