Selakoff v. Selakoff
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
In this action to annul a marriage the defendant interposed an answer and, though represented by counsel on the trial, did not actively defend.
I find that on the date of the plaintiff’s marriage to the defendant in this city February 28, 1948, the plaintiff was less than seventeen-years old. The defendant treated the plaintiff with contempt and brutality and refused to support her. In March, 1948, they were separated for a few days but were reconciled on the defendant’s promise to mend his ways. The reconciliation, however, was of short duration and on April 2, 1948, following another violent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keegan v. KeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Quinzi v. QuinziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duley Ex Rel. Alcabes v. DuleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959